| Oklahoma City Gun Club - IPSC Division June IPSC Match 6/6/2009 | |||||||||||||||||
| Overall - Single Stack Division | |||||||||||||||||
| Place | Name | USPSA | Class | Division | PF | Lady | Mil | Law | For | Age | Match Pts | Match % | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson, Matt | FY39129 | B | Single Stack | Major | 840.0118 | 100.000% | ||||||||||
| 2 | Nixon, Anthony | TY47716 | B | Single Stack | Major | 829.9106 | 98.797% | ||||||||||
| 3 | Pilaski, Al | TY47772 | C | Single Stack | Major | 514.9096 | 61.298% | ||||||||||
| 4 | Kimmel, Mark | U | Single Stack | Major | 513.5463 | 61.136% | |||||||||||
| 5 | Rumpl, Tony | U | Single Stack | Major | 511.2196 | 60.859% | |||||||||||
| 6 | Spahr, David | U | Single Stack | Major | 272.0474 | 32.386% | |||||||||||
| DQed | Means, Rick B | A62938 | U | Single Stack | Major | 0.0000 | 0.000% | ||||||||||
| Stage No: | 1 | X-Games | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Place | Name | No. | Class | Division | Points | Penalties | Time | Hit Factor | Stage Pts | Stage % | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Johnson, Matt | 79 | B | Single Stack | 110 | 0 | 17.42 | 6.3146 | 120.0000 | 100.00% | ||||||||||||
| 2 | Nixon, Anthony | 26 | B | Single Stack | 97 | 10 | 17.65 | 4.9292 | 93.6724 | 78.06% | ||||||||||||
| 3 | Pilaski, Al | 10 | C | Single Stack | 114 | 0 | 30.88 | 3.6917 | 70.1555 | 58.46% | ||||||||||||
| 4 | Rumpl, Tony | 74 | U | Single Stack | 114 | 0 | 35.77 | 3.1870 | 60.5644 | 50.47% | ||||||||||||
| 5 | Spahr, David | 6 | U | Single Stack | 100 | 10 | 32.48 | 2.7709 | 52.6570 | 43.88% | ||||||||||||
| 6 | Kimmel, Mark | 4 | U | Single Stack | 112 | 0 | 46.98 | 2.3840 | 45.3045 | 37.75% | ||||||||||||
| Stage No: | 2 | Hallway | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Place | Name | No. | Class | Division | Points | Penalties | Time | Hit Factor | Stage Pts | Stage % | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Nixon, Anthony | 26 | B | Single Stack | 120 | 0 | 24.28 | 4.9423 | 125.0000 | 100.00% | ||||||||||||
| 2 | Kimmel, Mark | 4 | U | Single Stack | 119 | 0 | 30.53 | 3.8978 | 98.5826 | 78.87% | ||||||||||||
| 3 | Johnson, Matt | 79 | B | Single Stack | 114 | 10 | 27.05 | 3.8447 | 97.2396 | 77.79% | ||||||||||||
| 4 | Pilaski, Al | 10 | C | Single Stack | 119 | 10 | 35.62 | 3.0601 | 77.3956 | 61.92% | ||||||||||||
| 5 | Rumpl, Tony | 74 | U | Single Stack | 122 | 0 | 41.65 | 2.9292 | 74.0849 | 59.27% | ||||||||||||
| 6 | Spahr, David | 6 | U | Single Stack | 115 | 0 | 69.54 | 1.6537 | 41.8252 | 33.46% | ||||||||||||
| Stage No: | 3 | The BIG Box | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Place | Name | No. | Class | Division | Points | Penalties | Time | Hit Factor | Stage Pts | Stage % | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Nixon, Anthony | 26 | B | Single Stack | 126 | 0 | 26.49 | 4.7565 | 130.0000 | 100.00% | ||||||||||||
| 2 | Johnson, Matt | 79 | B | Single Stack | 110 | 20 | 21.98 | 4.0946 | 111.9096 | 86.08% | ||||||||||||
| 3 | Rumpl, Tony | 74 | U | Single Stack | 129 | 0 | 37.96 | 3.3983 | 92.8790 | 71.45% | ||||||||||||
| 4 | Kimmel, Mark | 4 | U | Single Stack | 116 | 10 | 40.53 | 2.6153 | 71.4788 | 54.98% | ||||||||||||
| 5 | Pilaski, Al | 10 | C | Single Stack | 127 | 0 | 53.46 | 2.3756 | 64.9276 | 49.94% | ||||||||||||
| 6 | Spahr, David | 6 | U | Single Stack | 104 | 30 | 48.27 | 1.5330 | 41.8985 | 32.23% | ||||||||||||
| Stage No: | 4 | The Mineshaft | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Place | Name | No. | Class | Division | Points | Penalties | Time | Hit Factor | Stage Pts | Stage % | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Johnson, Matt | 79 | B | Single Stack | 146 | 10 | 23.03 | 5.9053 | 160.0000 | 100.00% | ||||||||||||
| 2 | Nixon, Anthony | 26 | B | Single Stack | 149 | 0 | 28.91 | 5.1539 | 139.6413 | 87.28% | ||||||||||||
| 3 | Pilaski, Al | 10 | C | Single Stack | 152 | 0 | 43.25 | 3.5145 | 95.2229 | 59.51% | ||||||||||||
| 4 | Kimmel, Mark | 4 | U | Single Stack | 143 | 30 | 37.71 | 2.9966 | 81.1908 | 50.74% | ||||||||||||
| 5 | Rumpl, Tony | 74 | U | Single Stack | 154 | 0 | 63.50 | 2.4252 | 65.7091 | 41.07% | ||||||||||||
| 6 | Spahr, David | 6 | U | Single Stack | 135 | 30 | 74.47 | 1.4100 | 38.2030 | 23.88% | ||||||||||||
| DQed | Means, Rick B | 71 | U | Single Stack | 43 | 220 | 0.01 | 0 | .0000 | 0.00% | ||||||||||||
| Stage No: | 5 | Chicken Coop | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Place | Name | No. | Class | Division | Points | Penalties | Time | Hit Factor | Stage Pts | Stage % | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Johnson, Matt | 79 | B | Single Stack | 117 | 10 | 22.46 | 4.7640 | 140.0000 | 100.00% | ||||||||||||
| 2 | Nixon, Anthony | 26 | B | Single Stack | 132 | 0 | 29.37 | 4.4944 | 132.0772 | 94.34% | ||||||||||||
| 3 | Kimmel, Mark | 4 | U | Single Stack | 120 | 20 | 30.76 | 3.2510 | 95.5374 | 68.24% | ||||||||||||
| 4 | Rumpl, Tony | 74 | U | Single Stack | 135 | 0 | 48.74 | 2.7698 | 81.3963 | 58.14% | ||||||||||||
| 5 | Pilaski, Al | 10 | C | Single Stack | 126 | 20 | 48.16 | 2.2010 | 64.6809 | 46.20% | ||||||||||||
| 6 | Spahr, David | 6 | U | Single Stack | 120 | 40 | 49.01 | 1.6323 | 47.9685 | 34.26% | ||||||||||||
| Stage No: | 6 | The Barricade | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Place | Name | No. | Class | Division | Points | Penalties | Time | Hit Factor | Stage Pts | Stage % | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Nixon, Anthony | 26 | B | Single Stack | 95 | 0 | 22.39 | 4.2430 | 100.0000 | 100.00% | ||||||||||||
| 2 | Johnson, Matt | 79 | B | Single Stack | 97 | 0 | 25.16 | 3.8553 | 90.8626 | 90.86% | ||||||||||||
| 3 | Rumpl, Tony | 74 | U | Single Stack | 99 | 0 | 38.41 | 2.5775 | 60.7471 | 60.75% | ||||||||||||
| 4 | Pilaski, Al | 10 | C | Single Stack | 96 | 0 | 38.21 | 2.5124 | 59.2128 | 59.21% | ||||||||||||
| 5 | Kimmel, Mark | 4 | U | Single Stack | 97 | 0 | 46.16 | 2.1014 | 49.5263 | 49.53% | ||||||||||||
| 6 | Spahr, David | 6 | U | Single Stack | 95 | 40 | 108.03 | 0.5091 | 11.9986 | 12.00% | ||||||||||||
| Stage No: | 7 | Close Quarter Standards | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Place | Name | No. | Class | Division | Points | Penalties | Time | Hit Factor | Stage Pts | Stage % | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Johnson, Matt | 79 | B | Single Stack | 97 | 10 | 13.30 | 6.5414 | 120.0000 | 100.00% | ||||||||||||
| 2 | Nixon, Anthony | 26 | B | Single Stack | 108 | 0 | 18.09 | 5.9701 | 109.5197 | 91.27% | ||||||||||||
| 3 | Pilaski, Al | 10 | C | Single Stack | 107 | 0 | 23.56 | 4.5416 | 83.3143 | 69.43% | ||||||||||||
| 4 | Rumpl, Tony | 74 | U | Single Stack | 111 | 0 | 26.85 | 4.1341 | 75.8388 | 63.20% | ||||||||||||
| 5 | Kimmel, Mark | 4 | U | Single Stack | 105 | 0 | 26.78 | 3.9208 | 71.9259 | 59.94% | ||||||||||||
| 6 | Spahr, David | 6 | U | Single Stack | 106 | 0 | 51.86 | 2.0440 | 37.4966 | 31.25% | ||||||||||||